|
This week's reframe is about understanding our reactive agreement and disagreement patterns. Episode Transcript The Receiving Feedback Fallback card states, "You do not need to immediately agree or disagree when you get challenging feedback. You only need to acknowledge receiving it." And the card invites you to memorize what's called the feedback fallback phrase. It's a neutral phrase for when you feel stunned, something like, "I need some time to process that. Can we return to this later today?" So let's spend a moment with what this card is really addressing. When receiving feedback, especially from someone who holds more power in the relationship, a manager, a mentor, many of us default to immediately agreeing with it. And if we genuinely do agree with it, that's fine. But sometimes the feedback is complex, challenging, we haven't fully processed it yet, and still we find ourselves nodding along, agreeing, thanking them as a way to dial down the tension in the conversation or to make sure the giver knows we appreciate their effort. There are many reasons why some of us do this, and we could spend hours exploring the roots of it, but the point of this card isn't to dig into why. The point is to notice whether this might be a habit of yours, because once you see it, you can then address it. Now, some of us go the opposite route. We receive feedback on an area where we could improve, and even if it was delivered relatively well, our fists are metaphorically up and we're ready to throw down. Again, before we've truly had a chance to process what was said, before we've genuinely decided whether we agree or disagree, we're ready... We're already defending. We make up a reason for why we did the thing. We might blame someone or something. We also just might flat out deny it happened. Both of those responses, the instant yes and the instant no, share the same problem. As you're probably seeing here, they are reactions made before any real processing has occurred. And challenging feedback, the kind of feedback that might be hard to implement, might be about an area we thought we were doing well in, and so it might be especially hard to hear, deserves processing. This processing phase is vital and why it has its own suit in the deck. This in-the-moment receiving of feedback is where the feedback fallback phrase comes in. Having a neutral memorized phrase ready means that in the moment you feel stunned, you don't have to generate a response from scratch while your mind is racing. You simply say, "I need some time to process that. Can we return to this later today?" Those two short sentences can do a ton of work. They acknowledge the feedback. They signal respect to the giver. And depending on the urgency and other factors, they buy you the one thing that challenging feedback requires most, which is time. That's card 02 of the receiving feedback suit. If you recognize yourself in either pattern, the quick agree or the quick defend, try preparing your fallback phrase before your next feedback conversation. Having those words ready might give you a bit more confidence, a bit more ability to stay in the present rather than defaulting to reacting. |
"Workplace feedback expert" —Harvard Business Review. I'm a professor at Penn State on a mission to build feedback literacy for all. Nearly 10,000 students in my poetry class. 2,000+ leaders attended my feedback webinar with Harvard. Each week, 3MR offers a reframe to help you live with more clarity and courage.
This week's reframe is about the ripple effect of openly seeking feedback. Click to watch on YouTube Episode Transcript The Seeking Feedback Modeling card states, "When you seek feedback, it makes it easier for others to do the same. Openly normalizing the vulnerability needed for growth has a powerful ripple effect." And the card invites you to practice what's called the signal, which you can do by asking someone whose opinion you value, "I'm trying to improve my... What specific changes...
For decades, the career advice was to become T-shaped: to develop mastery of one domain (the vertical part of the T) and then pair that with a general set of skills (the horizontal part of the T). It was and still is useful advice. But it’s no longer enough. I spent 18 months at Cisco on a project that touched millions of people in 195 countries. The colleagues who moved the project forward weren't the deepest specialists or the broadest generalists. They were something rarer. They had...
In 1924, a psychology professor named Robert Chenault Givler published The Ethics of Hercules, arguing that our ethical values and our bodies should not be studied apart — that our bodies provide important signals that shape our values and our ability to make decisions. It was a radical idea then and still is today in 2026, a time when many of us are told to believe that pure brainpower or AI tools can solve everything. One look around the world’s events and I can’t help but ask: How’s that...