3MR: One sentence before the hard part


This week's reframe covers when (and why) to state your intent before giving challenging feedback.


Episode Transcript

The Giving Feedback Intent card states, "State your positive intent. If the receiver assumes you don't have their best interest in mind, even great feedback may not land well." And the card invites you to use what's called the preface, something like, "I'm sharing this because I believe in what you're doing, and I think one thing could make it even better."

Let's spend a moment with what this card is really asking of us. Feedback givers often assume the receiver already believes they have their best interest in mind. But as we cover throughout the receiving feedback suit, receiving can be hard, in part because of the many dimensions of fear that can arise.

That includes the fear that maybe the giver doesn't have your best interest in mind at all. And when there's a significant power difference in the relationship, that fear can escalate into something bigger. Could be the belief that this feedback might mean you're on the path to getting fired, for example.

So there are occasions when a simple preface stating your positive intent out loud can be incredibly helpful. For a teacher or a coach, making sure your student or player knows you believe in them and what they're doing can be one of the most important things you vocalize before delivering challenging feedback.

But, and this is where I think the card gets more interesting, context is everything. If you said this preface every single time, it would lose its value. Honestly, it would just be weird. And used verbatim among peers, it could even come across as condescending. So while stating your positive intent is a solid general rule to hold in place, part of growing into a great giver of feedback is developing discernment, knowing what form that intent should take, whether it should be spoken at all, when, and how to frame it for the particular relationship in front of you.

Here's what that looks like in practice. So if I had a student who I knew was struggling with confidence but who was excelling on a project, I might preface my feedback exactly as this card suggests, like word for word. But if I've been working with student for three years and through countless hours of collaboration, I've already expressed that belief in various ways, I might skip the preface entirely and simply let them know I have some feedback and ask them if it's a good time to receive it.

Same principle, different forms. The discernment is the skill. So that's card zero two of the giving feedback suit. Before your next feedback conversation, take a moment to consider what the receiver might be assuming about your intent. You may find that a, a single sentence offered at the right moment changes how everything after it lands.

3-Minute Reframe

"Workplace feedback expert" —Harvard Business Review. I'm a professor at Penn State on a mission to build feedback literacy for all. Nearly 10,000 students in my poetry class. 2,000+ leaders attended my feedback webinar with Harvard. Each week, 3MR offers a reframe to help you live with more clarity and courage.

Read more from 3-Minute Reframe

This week's reframe is about the ripple effect of openly seeking feedback. Click to watch on YouTube Episode Transcript The Seeking Feedback Modeling card states, "When you seek feedback, it makes it easier for others to do the same. Openly normalizing the vulnerability needed for growth has a powerful ripple effect." And the card invites you to practice what's called the signal, which you can do by asking someone whose opinion you value, "I'm trying to improve my... What specific changes...

For decades, the career advice was to become T-shaped: to develop mastery of one domain (the vertical part of the T) and then pair that with a general set of skills (the horizontal part of the T). It was and still is useful advice. But it’s no longer enough. I spent 18 months at Cisco on a project that touched millions of people in 195 countries. The colleagues who moved the project forward weren't the deepest specialists or the broadest generalists. They were something rarer. They had...

In 1924, a psychology professor named Robert Chenault Givler published The Ethics of Hercules, arguing that our ethical values and our bodies should not be studied apart — that our bodies provide important signals that shape our values and our ability to make decisions. It was a radical idea then and still is today in 2026, a time when many of us are told to believe that pure brainpower or AI tools can solve everything. One look around the world’s events and I can’t help but ask: How’s that...